Justice Kavanaugh Allows Illinois Governor’s Stay-At-Home Order with Religious Exemption to Stand
Without explanation, without referring the matter to the entire Court, and without calling for a response, Justice Kavanaugh denied a request for an emergency injunction to strike down Illinois Governor Pritzker’s executive order limiting gatherings to 50 people while exempting religious gathering.
Likely Justice Kavanaugh refused to grant the injunction because the standard is high. The Supreme Court only grants injunctive relief denied by a lower court when “the legal rights at issue are indisputably clear” and, even then, “sparingly and only in the most critical and exigent circumstances.”
The Illinois Republican Party wants to hold numerous in-person gathering leading up to the Presidential election in November but can’t because its gatherings aren’t religious. It also claims the governor has declined to enforce his executive order against protestors following the death of George Floyd. The Illinois Republican Party argued that the executive order violates the First Amendment because it favors religious speech and Black Lives Matter speech over its speech.
The Supreme Court has held that “content-based” restrictions on speech are subject to strict (usually fatal) scrutiny.
The federal district court concluded that the executive order’s exemption for religion was content-based. However, the court found that it met the requirements of strict scrutiny. The Seventh Circuit agreed noting it recently held that while the governor doesn’t have accommodate religion this way during the pandemic, he was not forbidden from doing so.
The Illinois Republican Party agreed that the religious exemption meets strict-scrutiny’s compelling interest requirement but not it’s narrow tailoring requirement. “[T]he lack of narrow tailoring is especially evident because the Governor’s order exempts not only religious services, but all religious activity. And it exempts religious activity from not only the ban on gathering, but also the masks mandate and all social distancing requirements.”
The federal district court found no content-based restrictions related to speech at protests because the Illinois Republican Party offered no evidence that the governor enforced the executive order differently against protesters based on the content of their message. The Seventh Circuit didn’t address this argument in its brief opinion. According to the Illinois Republican Party, “[t]he Governor may not hold Republicans’ political speech to ‘a different standard’ than the speech from Black Lives Matter he has promised protection.”