
States Will Feel the Pinch of Sequestration, but a Bigger Budget Bite is ComingBy Jennifer Ginn | Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 11:42 amStates will feel it when sequestration takes effect tomorrow, but there could be worse things down the road. “For states, I would say the hit (from sequestration) is significant, but it’s not catastrophic,” said Chris Whatley, director of CSG’s Washington, D.C., office. When Congress passed the Budget Control Act in 2011, it put into place mandatory budget cuts for both domestic and defense spending if Congress could not agree on a way to reduce the national deficit. Originally set to take effect Jan. 2, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 extended that deadline to March 1. |
Supreme Court to Scrutinize Federal Agency DeferenceBy Lisa Soronen | Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:51 amThe issue the Supreme Court will decide in City of Arlington & Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee v. FCC is whether courts should defer to a federal agency’s determination that it has authority to interpret a statute. If this issue seems a bit esoteric, the facts of the case help illustrate what is at stake for state government. |
Resolution Supporting States' Rights to Regulate GamingBy CSG Executive Committee | Monday, December 3, 2012 at 12:00 am |
Resolution Supporting the State Department Office of Global Intergovernmental AffairsBy CSG Executive Committee | Monday, December 3, 2012 at 12:00 am |
Arizona Ballot Initiative Would Allow State to Control Federal Land, Including Grand CanyonBy Brydon Ross | Tuesday, October 30, 2012 at 5:18 pmNext week, Arizona voters will go to the polls and cast their votes on Proposition 120 which would amend the state constitution to declare Arizona's "sovereign and exclusive authority and jurisdiction over the air, water, public lands, minerals, wildlife and other natural resources within its boundaries." The controversial proposal is a reaction by frustrated lawmakers with federal land management policies they believe stymie development and limit economic growth. Opponents of the proposal object to opening up millions of acres protected public lands including wilderness areas and wildlife refuges to potential development, and have raised special concern that the proposal would turn over the iconic Grand Canyon National Park to state control. |
State-Federal Relations: Revolt Against Coercive Federalism?By Audrey Wall | Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 12:00 amPartisan polarization characterizes the current period of coercive federalism, shaping state-federal relations in often conflictual ways. Major clashes have occurred over health care, immigration, education, environmental protection, voting rights and numerous cultural issues such as abortion. State-federal disputes over health care and immigration have, moreover, generated two U.S. Supreme Court contests that could mark a pivotal advance or rollback of federal power over the states. At the same time, austerity and scrambles for tax revenue continue to characterize intergovernmental fiscal relations, while social welfare spending drives state budgets and squeezes funding for nonwelfare functions and for local governments. |
Book of the States 2012, Chapter 2: Federalism and Intergovernmental RelationsBy Audrey Wall | Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 12:00 am |
State-Federal Relations in the Age of AusterityBy Chris Whatley | Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 12:00 am |
The Uniform Law Commission: Preserving the Roles of Federal and State LawBy Audrey Wall | Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 12:00 amThe Uniform Law Commission is actively engaging with the federal government on behalf of the states to create and preserve an effective balance of federalism. It is also serving to increase the dialogue about the benefits of cooperative federalism and developing guiding principles on how responsibilities can be best allocated to preserve the balance of state and federal roles. |
Supreme Court Hears A Number of Significant Federalism CasesBy Lisa Soronen | Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 12:00 amIn its October Term 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide four significant and prominent federalism cases involving states. These cases include the Affordable Care Act cases, the Arizona immigration case, the Texas redistricting case and the California Medicaid case. The State and Local Legal Center (SLLC) filed amicus curiae briefs in four cases to be decided this term affecting state and local government, including the California Medicaid case. |












