
State-Federal Relations in the Age of AusterityBy Chris Whatley | Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 12:00 am |
State-Federal Relations: Civil War Redux?By Audrey Wall | Friday, July 1, 2011 at 12:00 amThe 2010 elections exacerbated party polarization and, along with it, a polarization of state federal relations, which is produced when one party controls most of the federal government and another party controls most of the states. The 2010 federal health care law aggravated this polarization and, because of its impacts on the states, produced an unprecedented challenge to its constitutionality by more than half the states. The 2010 federal financial regulation law and the U.S. Supreme Court’s application of the Second Amendment to the states also presage further federal incursions into state and local governance at a time when federal budget cutbacks and rising social welfare costs will heighten state and local fiscal stress. |
Unemployment Insurance Trust Funds : UPDATE November 2010By Jennifer Burnett | Monday, November 22, 2010 at 4:25 pm |
Resolution Supporting the Amendment of the Unfunded Mandates Reform ActBy CSG Executive Committee | Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 12:00 amBE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that The Council of State Governments encourages Congress to amend the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act to: 1. Apply UMRA’s cost estimation requirements to legislation that alters the conditions for receiving already existing federal grant assistance such as Medicaid and federal grants under the No Child Left Behind Act. 2. Expand the scope of cost estimates to include indirect costs imposed by new legislation and rule making such as lost revenue. 3. Remove the exception for mandates issued by independent regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 4. Remove the current exception for urgent federal regulations issued without prior notice by requiring cost estimates to be issued for such urgent rule making decisions within six months after their adoption. |







