
Personal Vehicle Sharing (CA)By CSG Committee on Suggested State Legislation | Saturday, May 19, 2012 at 12:00 amThis Act prohibits a private passenger motor vehicle from being classified for insurance purposes as a commercial, for-hire, or permissive use vehicle, or livery solely on the basis that it is being used for personal vehicle sharing if the annual revenue received by the vehicle’s owner that is generated by personal vehicle sharing does not exceed the annual expenses of owning and operating the vehicle. That includes, but is not limited to, depreciation, interest, lease payments, automobile loan payments, insurance, maintenance, parking, and fuel, and the fact that the personal vehicle sharing is conducted pursuant to a personal vehicle sharing program. |
Personal Vehicle Sharing (OR)By CSG Committee on Suggested State Legislation | Saturday, May 19, 2012 at 12:00 amThis Act defines personal vehicle sharing as the use of a private passenger motor vehicle by people other than the vehicle’s registered owner in connection with a personal vehicle sharing program. It defines a personal vehicle sharing program as a legal entity qualified to do business in the state that is engaged in the business of facilitating the sharing of private passenger motor vehicles for noncommercial use by people within the state. |
Transportation Policy Task Force: Transportation's Uncertain Future: Politics, Roads & High-Speed RailBy Sean Slone | Thursday, May 17, 2012 at 6:10 pmFinance at the state and federal levels and alternatives to the gas tax are two major topics in the transportation discussion. In addition, as high-speed rail is put on the backburner elsewhere, the dream is still alive in California. This session focused on how infrastruture investment can impact the road construction industry and a company like UPS. Speakers also discussed what California has planned in high-speed rail and what it could mean for the rest of the country. |
Transportation Funding CommissionsBy Sean Slone | Tuesday, May 8, 2012 at 8:41 amAbsent a consensus on how to address an ever-widening gap between state revenues available to spend on transportation infrastructure and how much it actually costs to maintain and improve it, a number of states in 2011 turned to specially appointed task forces and commissions for answers. Iowa, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Washington were among the states with panels to issue recommendations. This brief examines their processes and findings, how their funding recommendations have fared politically and the chances for future success. |
Gem or Clunker: Success of Auto Rebate Program DebatableBy Jennifer Ginn | Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 12:00 amThe economic forecast was anything but rosy when the Car Allowance Rebate System—otherwise known as Cash for Clunkers—kicked off in July 2009. Unemployment had reached 9.4 percent. Both Chrysler and GM had filed for bankruptcy. Things were not looking good for the economy in general or automakers specifically. That’s where Cash for Clunkers came in. |
Sales Taxes, Infrastructure Banks, Bonding, Tolling All in the Toolbox as States Seek Transportation Funding SolutionsBy Sean Slone | Monday, April 30, 2012 at 5:09 pm |
Show Me the Money: Missouri Considers Its Transportation FutureBy Sean Slone | Friday, April 27, 2012 at 4:05 pmI spoke yesterday with the Vice Chair of the Missouri House Transportation Committee, Rep. Thomas Long (R), who called to fill me in on the state of transportation funding in the Show Me State. Missouri was one of the states that I included in my “13 States to Watch in 2012” at the beginning of the year based on a 2011 comment by a Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) official that the department was “exploring the possibility of doubling the state gas tax over 10 years to help pay for the widening of I-70 between St. Louis and Kansas City.” In our conversation, Long made it clear that such a scenario was never in play in the Missouri legislature this session. Lawmakers did consider bills to have voter referenda on lowering the state gas tax while raising the diesel tax and adding a sales tax dedicated to road funding. A plan to toll I-70 was also considered. |
Improving Transportation Options for Older AmericansBy Sean Slone | Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 9:50 amAs they age, seniors face many transportation challenges. There are numerous ways state governments can help meet these challenges both for seniors who are still behind the wheel and for those who are no longer able to drive. They include policies to make road and pedestrian infrastructure safer, improve access to public transportation and better coordinate limited transportation resources. |
Report Outlines Communications Strategy for “Selling America on Transportation”By Sean Slone | Monday, April 23, 2012 at 4:34 pmAs states anxiously await the outcome of a House-Senate conference committee on federal surface transportation authorization legislation, the Miller Center, a nonpartisan institute based at the University of Virginia, is just out with a new report entitled “Are We There Yet? Selling America on Transportation.” It’s the distillation of a conference that I wrote about last fall (see my blog post here). The report outlines a communications strategy that conference participants said is needed this year to convince the American people and their elected representatives of the need for investment in transportation. |
State Transportation Funding Updates: Maryland Picks Up the Pieces; Georgia, Pennsylvania and Ohio Look AheadBy Sean Slone | Friday, April 13, 2012 at 5:03 pmPolicymakers in Maryland are pondering how to move forward after the legislature wrapped up its session this week without finding new revenues for transportation. Meanwhile, Georgia continues to look ahead to this summer’s increasingly important referendum votes on regional transportation projects and the sales tax increases to fund them. Pennsylvania’s Auditor General tries to jumpstart transportation investment in his state. And Ohio looks to innovative revenue sources to tackle long-neglected projects. |








