
MAP-21 Implementation: States and the Future of TransportationBy Sean Slone | Wednesday, April 10, 2013 at 10:18 amThe passage of MAP-21, the federal surface transportation authorization bill, by Congress in 2012 provided some certainty for state transportation agencies that had dealt with short-term extensions of the previous bill for nearly three years. Moreover, the legislation included many policy changes they had long sought: the consolidation of federal programs, provisions to accelerate the delivery of transportation projects, an emphasis on performance measurement and an infusion of cash for a popular credit assistance program. But state transportation officials say the implementation of MAP-21 continues to present challenges even as the discussion must now turn to its successor--due in 2014--and the important question of how to fund the federal transportation program going forward. |
Civil Engineers' Report Card: Some Transportation Infrastructure Grades Show Uptick; Additional Investment & Leadership NeededBy Sean Slone | Tuesday, March 19, 2013 at 5:53 pmEfforts by states and communities to move forward with infrastructure investment were among the reasons some areas of transportation saw improvement in recent years, according to a new report from the American Society of Civil Engineers that provides a treasure trove of information for state officials about exactly what the nation faces. |
Transportation Professionals Ponder Future Transportation FinancingBy Sean Slone | Thursday, January 31, 2013 at 12:00 amMAP-21, the long-awaited, two-year federal surface transportation authorization bill passed by Congress last summer, included many key policy changes long sought by state governments that are now being implemented. But for transportation professionals who gathered in Washington, D.C., in mid-January for the Transportation Research Board’s annual meeting, the bill’s shortcomings, especially in the fiscal arena, and impending fiscal cliffs in the months and years ahead drove much of the dialogue at the five-day conference. |
Overheard at the Transportation Research Board Annual MeetingBy Sean Slone | Tuesday, January 29, 2013 at 10:52 amI have an article appearing in this week’s Capitol Ideas electronic newsletter that looks at some of the issues discussed January 13-17 at the Transportation Research Board’s annual meeting in Washington, D.C. The gathering brought together more than 10,000 transportation professionals from around the world, including many officials who focus on transportation policy at the federal, state and local levels. As usual there was plenty more that happened during the five-day meeting than I had space to recount in the article. So here’s a roundup of additional comments from a variety of speakers on a variety of topics including MAP-21’s focus on performance measurement, efforts to accelerate project delivery, what MAP-21’s expansion of the TIFIA program will mean for states, how federal restrictions on tolling might need to change to allow states to meet their infrastructure needs, and why many expect federal transportation programs could see cuts well before MAP-21 expires in 2014. |
Recent Reports Highlight Mileage-Based User Fees, Tolling, Other Transportation IssuesBy Sean Slone | Friday, January 11, 2013 at 3:35 pmI’m about to head to Washington, D.C. for the Transportation Research Board’s annual meeting (more on that below). But before I hit the road, I thought I would leave you with a few links to some recent transportation-related reports and articles that might be worthy of your time. I have items on mileage-based user fees, the future of tolling, speed limits, the road building industry forecast for 2013, transit-oriented development and how to communicate the value of preserving infrastructure. |
Top 5 Issues for 2013: TransportationBy Sean Slone | Monday, January 7, 2013 at 12:00 am |
Top 5 Issues for 2013 Expanded: TransportationBy Sean Slone | Monday, December 17, 2012 at 10:43 amWhile 2012 saw Congress finally take action on a federal surface transportation authorization bill, much of the action in 2013 could shift to state capitals and set the stage for what’s likely to be a pivotal 2014. Here’s my list of the top 5 issues in transportation for 2013 and some additional resources where you can read more. |
James Bass: Transportation Bill Doesn't Look Far Down the RoadBy Sean Slone | Monday, December 17, 2012 at 9:41 amThe new federal surface transportation authorization bill includes many provisions welcomed by state governments. But the two-year bill, known as MAP-21, did not address long-term transportation revenue needs. Attendees learned how states are implementing MAP-21 and exploring potential new transportation revenue sources and got an update on the state of the nation’s infrastructure. Speakers included representatives from the American Society of Civil Engineers, the Texas Department of Transportation, and Texas A&M University’s Texas Transportation Institute. |
State of the Nation's InfrastructureBy Sean Slone | Monday, December 17, 2012 at 9:33 amThe new federal surface transportation authorization bill includes many provisions welcomed by state governments. But the two-year bill, known as MAP-21, did not address long-term transportation revenue needs. Attendees learned how states are implementing MAP-21 and exploring potential new transportation revenue sources and got an update on the state of the nation’s infrastructure. Speakers included representatives from the American Society of Civil Engineers, the Texas Department of Transportation, and Texas A&M University’s Texas Transportation Institute. |
Transportation Bill Doesn't Look Far Down the RoadBy Sean Slone | Sunday, December 2, 2012 at 11:54 amThe new federal surface transportation authorization bill includes many provisions welcomed by state governments. But the two-year bill, known as MAP-21, did not address long-term transportation revenue needs. Attendees learned how states are implementing MAP-21 and exploring potential new transportation revenue sources and got an update on the state of the nation’s infrastructure. Speakers included representatives from the American Society of Civil Engineers, the Texas Department of Transportation, and Texas A&M University’s Texas Transportation Institute. |





